(905) 415-1636

Le v. Norris: Responsible Adherence to an Existing Court Order

The decision in Le v. Norris elucidates what the Court expects when it asks parties to adhere to existing court orders during the COVID-19 crisis. This is another case in which a parent unilaterally varied the existing parenting schedule, which prompted the other parent to bring a motion seeking a return to the specified access schedule.

Factual Background

The parties have a three year-old child and both live in the city of Oakville. The child resides primarily with the mother and the father has regular court-ordered visits with the child twice per week, as per the Order of Justice Kurz dated December 5, 2019.

The father brought a motion seeking a remedy for the mother’s alleged breach of the existing order. In her responding materials, the mother admitted that she was not complying with the existing order, but she explained that this was due to several reasons, including the father’s harassing behavior, her not having the opportunity to vary the existing order, and her anxieties regarding the ongoing COVID-19 crisis.

Legal Analysis

The Court found that while the mother’s concerns are understandable and relatable, they do not provide sufficient justification to deviate from the existing order, especially given the fact that there was not enough evidence of the father’s allegedly harassing behavior. Although the mother was intending to vary the existing order, any delay in commencing such proceedings would be the mother’s responsibility and would not be a reason to suspend the current parenting arrangement.

The Court explained that the mother’s concerns can be addressed through responsible adherence to the existing court order. “Responsible adherence” means following physical distancing protocols, taking every precautionary measure as advised by governments and health authorities, and not doing anything that would expose a parent or the child to an increased risk of contracting the coronavirus. Based on this analysis, access was ordered to continue pursuant to the existing order.

For more information, please call us at Feldstein Family Law Group P.C. or contact our firm online.

More From the Feldstein Blog

Ontario Family Law, Translated

The statute is dense. The stakes are personal. These articles unpack the parts clients ask about most.

Case Blog

Gergis v. Michael 2021 ONSC 4754

Background  The Applicant husband and Respondent wife married in 2007 in Egypt. The Respondent is a qualified physician in Egypt although was unable to obtain the certification required ... Read more

June 12, 2026 · 6 min read

Feldstein Family Law Group, P.C.

The Law Is Complex.
The First Step Isn't.

Free, confidential consultation with an experienced Ontario family law lawyer. One call can change everything.

Markham · Oakville · Mississauga · Vaughan

Call (905) 415-1636

Responses within one business day — often the same day.

Our Offices

Serving Families Across Ontario & the Greater Toronto Area

Four Feldstein Family Law Group offices across the GTA — close to where our clients live, work, and raise their families.

Markham

20 Crown Steel Dr Suite 8
Markham, ON L3R 9X9, Canada

Map & Directions

Mississauga

3464 Semenyk Ct Suite 213
Mississauga, ON L5C 4P8, Canada

Map & Directions

Vaughan

3865 Major MacKenzie Dr W Suite 107
Vaughan, ON L4H 4P4, Canada

Map & Directions

Oakville

209 Speers Rd Suite 5
Oakville, ON L6K 0H5, Canada

Map & Directions

Communities We Serve

Feldstein Family Law Group represents clients across the Greater Toronto Area — including Toronto, Markham, Oakville, Mississauga, Vaughan, Richmond Hill, Thornhill, Unionville, Stouffville, Aurora, Newmarket, Brampton, Etobicoke, North York, Scarborough, Burlington, Milton, Georgetown, Woodbridge, Maple, King City, and the surrounding communities of York Region, Peel Region, Halton Region, and Durham Region.