Request a Consultation

Feldstein Family Law Group

At a difficult time like this, put us in your corner and we will fight for your rights.

FAQs - Child Custody and Access

Usually a biological or adoptive parent will get custody of the children. However, the relevant provisions in both the Divorce Act and the Children’s Law Reform Act allow third parties to make applications. The decision is always made in the best interests of the child.

 

There are four types of custody orders: temporary, sole, joint, and shared custody.

 

If your child is still a dependent and your former spouse/partner has primary physical residence of the child then you will have to pay child support. However, if the time is shared (i.e. if your child spends at least 40% of his or her time with you), then the amount of child support that you need to pay may be lowered.

 

Custodial parents have no right to deny or limit the rights of an access parent. But you may take steps with the Family Responsibilities Office (FRO) to enforce the child support order.

 

A child cannot decide where or with whom he or she would like to live since it is the job of the judge to determine what the best interests of the child are and who should be awarded custody of the child. However, the child’s wishes can be presented to the judge for his or her consideration.

 

Of course. Other family members may be granted access to your child if they can show to the court that they have an existing close relationship with the child and that ending the relationship will have a negative impact on him or her.

 

The judge will consider solely “the best interests of the child” as opposed to the best interests of the parents or other individuals. Therefore, when deciding which parent should be granted custody and which should be given access the judge will consider several things.

 

An order is said to be ex parte when it is granted by a judge at the request of and for the benefit of one party only, without notice to or contestation by the other party. Therefore, only one party appears before the judge and gives his or her version of the facts even though a judge is normally required to hear from all of the parties. Typically, ex parte orders are granted for temporary/interim custody or in extreme cases where an order needs to be made right away for the safety and protection of the child, i.e. if there is a risk of abduction or possibility of abuse.

 

Yes, by law it is mandatory that every order made by a judge gives effect to the principle of maximum contact so that every child of the marriage has as much contact with each parent as is necessary to advance his or her best interests.

 

It might also be beneficial to work out an arrangement with your former spouse/partner beforehand to present to the court. This can have the effect of reducing the time that you will need to spend in court as well as the cost. If that proves to be impossible then you should gather evidence showing that granting custody to you and access to your former spouse/partner (or vice versa) would be in the best interests of the child.

 

Probably not because judges are aware of the fact that testifying in court can be a very scary experience for a child, especially if that child is forced to testify against a parent or during a bitter custody dispute.

 

The best interests of the child is the only factor that judges have to consider when making any decision relating to custody of or access to a child.

 

The differences between reasonable, fixed, and supervised access.

 

The Office of the Children’s Lawyer (OCL) is a law office in the Ministry of the Attorney General which provides legal services and representation to children under the age of 18 with respect to their property and personal rights.

 

The first thing you can do is apply to court to try and get the court order enforced so that he or she does provide access as previously agreed to or ordered. If that fails then your former partner/spouse may be found in contempt of the order and fined or imprisoned.

 

You can apply to the appropriate court for a variation. However, in order to vary an existing custody or access order you must have a good and legitimate reason. You need to show the court that there has been a material change in your circumstances, condition, needs and means that warrants a variation. In other words, your situation has greatly changed to the extent that the order needs to be varied in order to be complied with.

 

There are several things you may do. You may include a provision in your separation agreement specifying that the child is not to be removed from the province unless both you and your former spouse/partner consent to it. If there is no agreement then ask the court to make “non-removal of the child without consent” a term of the custody and access order made. If you are still worried then you may ask the court to supervise the order to ensure that the child is not removed from the province.

 

20 Crown Steel Drive, Suite 8
Markham, Ontario, L3R 9X9 | 905.415.1636

© 2012. Feldstein Family Law Group Professional Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Website design and promotion by digital eM-space, a division of LawyerLocate.ca Inc.